Concept
Degrowth
Also known as: Décroissance, Post-growth
An economic-political framework arguing that further growth in resource and energy throughput is incompatible with planetary boundaries and human well-being — and proposing planned reduction in throughput, particularly in already-wealthy societies, while improving quality of life through redistribution, shorter work weeks, commons-based provision, and shifting from material accumulation to relational well-being. Articulated extensively in French intellectual tradition (André Gorz, Serge Latouche, Cornelius Castoriadis); developed and contested through the international degrowth conferences (2008-present); influential through Jason Hickel's Less Is More (2020), Kate Raworth's Doughnut Economics (2017), and substantial European policy conversation.
What degrowth is and isn’t
Degrowth IS:
- Reduction in resource and energy throughput in already-wealthy societies
- Improving quality of life through redistribution, shorter work, commons-based provision
- Decoupling well-being from material accumulation
- Selective: some sectors (renewable energy, public transit, healthcare, education) grow; others (fossil fuels, advertising, planned obsolescence, private jets) shrink
- Compatible with substantial growth in poorer regions
Degrowth IS NOT:
- Reduction for its own sake
- Imposed deprivation
- Anti-technology
- Universal contraction (Global South typically needs growth in basics)
- Recession (which is unmanaged contraction, mostly affecting the poor)
Core claims
- Growth and ecology — continuing material and energy throughput growth is incompatible with [[sufficiency|planetary boundaries]]; renewable substitution alone cannot resolve this
- Growth and well-being decoupled — wealthy societies have substantial well-being indicators (life expectancy, education, mental health, social connection) that don’t track with continued growth
- Distribution matters more than aggregate — redistribution within current GDP could substantially improve well-being without growth
- Time over money — reducing work hours, increasing leisure and relationship time is a major lever
- Commons over markets — shifting provision toward commons (libraries, public transit, public health, water, etc.) reduces material throughput needed for equivalent well-being
- Selective reduction — specific sectors should shrink (advertising, planned obsolescence, SUVs, fast fashion, private jets) while others grow
Articulations
- Serge Latouche — Farewell to Growth (2009); central French articulation
- Tim Jackson — Prosperity Without Growth (2009); UK economist; substantial policy work
- [[kate-raworth|Kate Raworth]] — [[doughnut-economics|Doughnut Economics]] (2017); related framework with substantial overlap
- Jason Hickel — Less Is More (2020); contemporary anthropologist; popular articulation
- Giorgos Kallis, Federico Demaria, others — academic degrowth scholarship
Policy proposals
Degrowth proposals typically include:
- Shorter work week — 4-day week; 20-30 hours
- Universal basic services — healthcare, education, transit, basic income
- Maximum income — caps on extreme wealth; redistribution
- Reduced advertising — bans on advertising in some sectors
- Right to repair — strong consumer-product-longevity laws
- Cooperative ownership — economic forms beyond shareholder capitalism
- Commons-based provisioning — public, cooperative, and community-owned services
- Carbon and resource taxes — pricing externalities
- Bans on specific high-impact products — SUVs in cities, private jets, fast fashion
Critiques
- Political feasibility — degrowth requires substantial political shifts; how does it happen?
- North-South tensions — Global South often emphasizes need for growth in basics
- Definitional ambiguity — degrowth means different things to different advocates
- Insufficient on technology — some critiques argue technology + clean energy could decouple
- Counter-arguments from technocrats — green-growth advocates argue it’s possible without contraction
Why this matters
Degrowth is one of the most-developed alternatives to growth-based economic frameworks. Its articulation has matured significantly through the 2010s-2020s. Whether or not the specific framing is adopted, the underlying questions — can growth-based economics continue indefinitely on a finite planet? what comes after? — are foundational to ecological civilization debates.
See also
Auto-generated from this entry’s typed relations: frontmatter, grouped by relation type so the editorial signal isn’t flattened.
- Shares approach with: [[doughnut-economics]] · [[sufficiency]] · [[energy-descent]]
Sources
- Less Is More, Jason Hickel (Penguin, 2020)
- Prosperity Without Growth, Tim Jackson (Earthscan, 2009)
- Farewell to Growth, Serge Latouche (Polity, 2009)
- Multiple degrowth-conference proceedings and academic publications
Rooted in life.
What links here, and how
Inbound connections from across the wiki, grouped by lens and by relationship. These appear automatically — every entity page declares what it links to, and that data populates here on the targets.
Nothing yet. This entry is currently one node away from the rest of the graph — links will appear here automatically as the wiki grows. Each new entity that mentions this one in its relations frontmatter shows up here.
0 inbound links · 3 outbound